Articles

July 23, 2012

Occupy the Dam: Brazil’s Indigenous Uprising

In the Amazonian backcountry, tribes are challenging construction of the world’s third-largest dam—by dismantling it. Here’s what they can teach us about standing up to power.     

 

In the Amazonian backcountry, tribes are challenging construction of the world’s third-largest dam—by dismantling it. Here’s what they can teach us about standing up to power.

Last month, hundreds of indigenous demonstrators began dismantling a dam in the heart ofBrazil’s rainforest to protest the destruction it will bring to lands they have loved and honored for centuries. The Brazilian government is determined to promote construction of the massive, $14 billion Belo Monte Dam, which will be the world’s third largest when it is completed in 2019. It is being developed by Norte Energia, a consortium of ten of the world’s largest construction, engineering, and mining firms set up specifically for the project.

Hydroelectric energy is anything but “clean” when measured in terms of the excruciating pain it causes individuals, social institutions, and local ecology. The Belo Monte Dam is the most controversial of dozens of dams planned in the Amazon region and threatens the lives and livelihoods of thousands of Amazonian people, plants, and animals. Situated on the Xingu River, the dam is set to flood roughly 150 square miles of already-stressed rainforest and deprive an estimated 20,000 people of their homes, their incomes, and—for those who succumb to malaria, bilharzia, and other diseases carried by insects and snails that are predicted to breed in the new reservoir—their lives. Moreover, the influx of immigrants will bring massive disruption to the socioeconomic balance of the region. People whose livelihoods have primarily depended on hunting and gathering or farming may suddenly find themselves forced to take jobs as manual laborers, servants, and prostitutes.

History has shown again and again that dams in general wreak havoc in areas where they are built, despite promises to the contrary by developers and governments. Hydroelectric energy is anything but “clean” when measured in terms of the excruciating pain it causes individuals, social institutions, and local ecology. The costs—often hidden—include those associated with the privatization of water; the extinction of plants that might provide cures for cancer, HIV, and other diseases; the silting up of rivers and lakes; and the disruption of migratory patterns for many species of birds.

The indigenous cultures threatened by the Belo Monte Dam, including those of the Xikrin, Juruna, Arara, Parakanã, Kuruaya and Kayapó tribes, are tied to the land: generations have hunted and gathered and cultivated the same areas for centuries. They—as well as local flora and fauna—have suffered disproportionately from the effects of other hydroelectric dams, while rarely gaining any of the potential benefits. Now they are fighting back. The indigenous people’s occupation of the dam garnered international attention, connecting their situation to other events across the globe.

Indigenous leaders from these groups have asked the Brazilian government to immediately withdraw the installation license for Belo Monte. They demand a halt to work until the government puts into place “effective programs and measures to address the impacts of the dam on local people.” They point out that a promised monetary program to compensate for the negative impacts of the mega-dam has not yet been presented in local villages; also, that a system to ensure small boat navigation in the vicinity of the cofferdams, temporary enclosures built to facilitate the construction process, has not been implemented. Without such a system, many will be isolated from markets, health care facilities, and other services. The cofferdams have already rendered much of the region’s water undrinkable and unsuitable for bathing. Wells promised by the government and Norte Energia have not yet been drilled. The list of grievances goes on and on and is only the latest in a very old story of exploitation of nature and people in the name of “progress.” Far too often, this has meant benefiting only the wealthiest in society and business.

Yet here in the backcountry of Brazil, there is a difference: the makings of a new story. The indigenous people’s occupation of the dam garnered international attention, connecting their situation to other events across the globe—the Arab Spring, democratic revolutions in Latin America, the Occupy Movement, and austerity strikes in Spain and other European nations. Brazil’s indigenous protesters have essentially joined protesters on every continent who are demanding that rights be restored to the people.

After enduring years of toxic dumping and rising cancer rates, indigenous Ecuadorians took oil giant Chevron to court to fight for the life of the rainforest—and its people.Stories take time to evolve. This one—the story of people awakening on a global level to the need to oppose and replace exploitative dreams—is still in its beginning phase. And the first chapter has been powerful, elegant, and bold.

A few years ago I was invited, with a group, to Ladakh, a protectorate of India, to meet with the Dalai Lama. Among a great deal of sage advice he offered was the following: “It is important to pray and meditate for peace, for a more compassionate and better world. But if that is all you do, it is a waste of time. You also must take actions to make that happen. Every single day.”It is time for each and every one us to follow that advice.

Opposing the Belo Monte Dam project provides an opportunity for you and me to honor those words, and those leading resistance to it can help us understand the importance of looking around—in our neighborhoods as well as globally—to determine what else we can do to change the story.

See link to original article on Yes! Magazine’s Website.

________________________________________________________________________

May 1, 2012

Religous and Social Responsibility: End “Islamaphobia”

Bainbridge Island has a sad piece of history that I recently contemplated while visiting the Japanese American Exclusion Memorial not far from my home. This landmark commemorates the 110,000 Japanese Americans who were relocated to interment camps in the United States.

In the hysteria following the Pearl Harbor bombing, Japanese Americans were viewed as potential saboteurs and collaborators against the US. Immediately the FBI compiled a “Custodial Detention Index” tracking Japanese American citizens believed to be dangerous to national security. President Roosevelt then signed an executive order authorizing the internment of all people of Japanese ancestry living on the West Coast.

As I stood there, I thought of the parallels between the way we treated Japanese Americans then and our societal attitudes toward Muslim Americans today. Recently I have been speaking to a number of Muslim American groups across the country, and was struck by how many experience a type of racial prejudice that I will never experience, due to their last name and appearance.

If I am pulled over for speeding, I expect to receive a warning or a ticket at most. However, many Muslim Americans fear that they will be asked to step out of the car, patted down, and suspected of being a terrorist. Many who expressed this concern to me are upstanding doctors, lawyers, and businesspeople born in the U.S., not remotely resembling terrorists. As a country we have come a long way; however, we must improve our efforts in striving for tolerance, justice, and equality for all Americans and humanity as a whole.

A few days ago, India’s equivalent of George Clooney, Bollywood actor Shah Rukh Khan, was detained for a second time at a U.S. airport for more than two hours. This holdup caused a delay of his appearance at Yale and sparked protests against the U.S. in India.

Times of war may tempt us to skew our perceptions of other cultures, races, and ethnicities. The media constantly bombards us with images and stories meant to invoke a certain way of thinking; something to be mindful of during this period of turmoil between the U.S. and Middle East.

The 9/11 attacks sparked a wave of “Islamaphobia”, hatred and irrational fear of Islamic people. There have been heated threats against Muslim Americans. Numerous mosques have been subject to senseless threats, protests, and acts of violence.

Although a majority of Americans don’t feel this way towards our Muslim brothers and sisters, it is important to remind ourselves that Muslim extremists are a minority – just like Christian extremists. Let’s remember that Muslim American citizens, and Muslims around the world, join us in our pursuit to stop extremist violence. We all look forward to a world of peace, prosperity and hope.

  • Government Shutdown: A Corporatocracy Strategy!
    October 17, 2013

    By John Perkins It appears that the stalemate/gridlock madness has ended – at least for a short period. But before you utter a sigh of relief, please consider the costs -- estimated to be in the trillions -- to the economy and the toll taken on t...
  • U.S. Intelligence Establishment: Hero or Traitor?
    June 14, 2013

    By John Perkins Ever since Edward Snowden admitted that he was responsible for the biggest intelligence breach in U.S. history, the media has been in a frenzy over whether this man is a hero or a traitor. Snowden’s leaked evidence of two sweeping U.S. ...
  • The Arms Treaty - Thank you President Obama!
    April 4, 2013

    April 4, 2013 The Arms Treaty - Thank you President Obama! By John Perkins I just flew from SE Asia to the Middle East, two regions that have been the scenes of violence – much of it involving my country, the US – for most of my lifetime. Sit...
  • Italian Election: Awakening Consciousness?
    March 12, 2013

    These are the most current newsletters. For past newsletters please see the "Archived Newsletters" page. March 12, 2013 Italian Election: Awakening Consciousness? By John Perkins Who would have predicted that a comedian-turned-political ac...
  • Obama, 2013, Costa Rica, and the Maya Lands of Guatemala
    February 14, 2013

    February 14, 2013 Obama, 2013, Costa Rica, and the Maya Lands of Guatemala By John Perkins President Obama’s State of the Union address was a call for change and action. In many respects his words echoed the messages of the indigenous prophec...